Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines the profound and evolving engagement of post-war Japanese writer Hotta Yoshie with the Chinese intellectual Lu Xun. It takes as its central puzzle Hotta's paradoxical shift in attitude toward Lu Xun's tomb: from a stated wish in 1956 to revisit the modest grave he had seen in wartime Shanghai to his deliberate refusal to visit the newly monumentalized tomb during a 1957 trip to China. This study argues that Hotta's transformation was not merely personal, but driven by a fundamental intellectual reorientation spurred by his active participation in the Afro-Asian Writers’ Movement. Through a comparative analysis of his writings on Shanghai and his travelogues from India, the article demonstrates how Hotta re-contextualized his “Shanghai experience” within a broader critique of colonial modernity and global capitalism. He came to see Shanghai not as an isolated memory but as a node in a global system of exploitation shared by cities like Calcutta. Consequently, Hotta's interpretation of Lu Xun transcended the confines of Sino-Japanese relations, reimagining him as a universal symbol of resistance for the nascent Third World. His essays and travelogues, particularly In Shanghai (1959), reflect a critical re-evaluation of world literature—challenging Eurocentric canons and emphasizing the centrality of anti-colonial thought. Hotta's refusal to visit the new tomb is thus interpreted as a political act—a rejection of the erasure of individual, historical struggle in favor of a monolithic state narrative, and a profound statement on the politics of memory in the Cold War era.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ying Xiong (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: