Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyses of patronage and political parties often start from the assumption that patronage is a vote-winning and useful organizational strategy for a political party. This paper questions this assumption and suggests that, for the political party using it, patronage exacts a variety of costs. These undermine the party's existence as an organization with a collective purpose, and even its vote-winning capacities. Examples from a number of different countries and parties illustrate the argument.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carolyn M. Warner (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: