Why the study?
Does noninvasive mapping using NEEES improve visualization of arrhythmia patterns in patients with cardiomyopathy and inducible ventricular arrhythmias?
Observational (n=8)
Does noninvasive mapping using NEEES improve visualization of arrhythmia patterns in patients with cardiomyopathy and inducible ventricular arrhythmias?
A novel noninvasive electrophysiology system successfully visualized macro-reentrant circuits in scar-related VT and rotor activity in polymorphic VT/VF.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to assess the use of a novel noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system (NEEES) for mapping of ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS: Eight patients (2 females, mean age 50±17 years) with ischemic (n=3) and nonischemic (n=5) cardiomyopathy and inducible ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiology study were enrolled. Noninvasive mapping of ventricular arrhythmias was performed using the NEEES based on body-surface electrocardiograms and computed tomography imaging data. Arrhythmia patterns were analyzed using noninvasive phase mapping. RESULTS: Macro-reentrant VT circuits were observed in 3 ischemic and 1 nonischemic cardiomyopathy patient, respectively. In the remaining 4 patients, phase mapping revealed relatively stable rotor activity and multiple wavelets. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive cardiac mapping was able to visualize the macro-reentrant circuits in patients with scar-related VT. In patients without myocardial scar only polymorphic VT or VF was inducible, and rotor activity and multiple wavelets were observed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsyganov et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy with inducible ventricular arrhythmias (n=8). Noninvasive epicardial and endocardial electrophysiology system (NEEES) was evaluated on Visualization of ventricular arrhythmia patterns.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: