This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The charge-on-spring method is used to develop a rigid, three-site, polarizable water model, a noniterative and a self-consistent version. In this method, the polarizability is taken into account by a variable separation of charges on selected polarizable centers. One of the pair of polarization charges resides on a polarizable center, while the other one is treated as an additional particle attached to the polarizable center by a parabolic restraint potential. The separation is calculated in response to the instantaneous electric field. We parametrized two models which are based on noniterative and self-consistent versions of the method, respectively. We computed several liquid-phase and gas-phase properties and compared with data available from experiment and ab initio calculations. The condensed-phase properties of both models are in reasonable accord with experiment, apart from discrepancies in electrostatic properties consistent with a slightly too large liquid-state dipole.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: