Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Across four decades of AI deployment, the same six human challenges (trust calibration, reliance behavior, cognitive engagement, skill retention, accountability, and transparency) recur, yet fragmentation across research communities obscures this continuity and limits knowledge transfer. Functionally similar phenomena are repeatedly relabeled (a jangle fallacy): what aviation researchers call “automation complacency,” decision scientists call “algorithm appreciation,” and LLM researchers describe as “over-reliance.” This systematic review synthesizes 152 papers spanning aviation, healthcare, manufacturing/supply chain, and cross-domain contexts across three AI technology generations: decision support systems, autonomous systems, and large language model (LLM) agents. We introduce the Collaboration Convergence Framework (CCF), a 6 × 3 matrix with solution-maturity indicators that maps each challenge across generations. The framework shows that Gen 3 designers can transfer decades of evidence from automation and decision support research (particularly reliance calibration, cognitive forcing, and skill maintenance) rather than rediscovering them. Cross-generational synthesis also isolates three Gen 3 phenomena without direct precedent in earlier generations: epistemia (attributing genuine knowledge to LLMs based on surface fluency), attribution ambiguity in co-creation, and motivational withdrawal. We distill twelve transferable design principles and propose ten research directions, prioritizing skill-retention interventions and accountability frameworks. These findings carry direct sustainability implications aligned with Industry 5.0: protecting workforce capability under increasing automation (SDG 8), reducing duplicated research effort through cross-generational knowledge reuse (SDG 9), and supporting responsible deployment by treating collaboration risks as predictable rather than novel (SDG 12). The CCF provides conceptual infrastructure for cumulative learning across AI generations and industries.
Dong et al. (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: