Key result
Pioglitazone and weight loss both improve insulin resistance, with pioglitazone showing broader proteomic effects.
Why the study?
Insulin resistance is associated with atherogenic dyslipidemia and elevated ASCVD risk, but its impact on ApoA1-associated proteomic composition is unclear.
Does pioglitazone or weight loss improve the ApoA1-associated proteomic composition in participants without diabetes?
Cohort (n=861)
Does pioglitazone or weight loss improve the ApoA1-associated proteomic composition in participants without diabetes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Insulin-sensitizing interventions, particularly pioglitazone, improve the pro-atherogenic ApoA1 proteome associated with insulin resistance, highlighting a potential target to reduce residual ASCVD risk.
Insulin resistance (IR) contributes to atherogenic dyslipidemia and elevated ASCVD risk. Apolipoprotein A1 (ApoA1)-associated lipoproteins have diverse anti-atherogenic functions, but it is unclear whether IR drives adverse changes in their proteomic composition. We hypothesized that IR is associated with an atherogenic ApoA1 proteome and that insulin-sensitizing interventions would improve its composition. We studied 861 participants without diabetes (age 47 ± 12 years, 65.5% female). IR was directly measured using the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration via the insulin suppression test. ApoA1-associated proteins were quantified by mass spectrometry. A subset underwent interventions for 3 months (N total 108): pioglitazone, PIO n = 38 or weight loss, WL n = 70). Paired t-tests assessed pre- and post-intervention changes. At baseline, several ApoA1-associated proteins significantly correlated with SSPG. Both interventions improved IR (p < 0.01). PIO led to significant increases in 14 ApoA1-associated proteins, including ApoC1–C4, ApoA2, ApoA4, ApoD, ApoE, LCAT, and PON1/3. WL increased several ApoA1-associated proteins, including ApoA4, ApoD, ApoM, and PON1/3. In conclusion, IR is associated with a pro-atherogenic ApoA1 proteome, and both interventions improve this profile. However, PIO has a broader proteomic impact. These findings highlight the potential of targeting the ApoA1 proteome to reduce residual ASCVD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parsa et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Insulin resistance (n=861). Pioglitazone vs. Weight loss was evaluated on Changes in insulin resistance and ApoA1-associated proteins (p=<0.01). Pioglitazone and weight loss both improved insulin resistance and the ApoA1 proteome profile, though pioglitazone had a broader proteomic impact.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: