Key result
Beta-blocker responders show lower LVEF, higher heart rate, lower PVC burden, and longer QRS than CCB responders.
Why the study?
Although beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers are the primary medical treatments for symptomatic and frequent PVCs, it remains unclear which agent should be chosen based on patient and ECG characteristics.
Do clinical and ECG characteristics differ between idiopathic PVC patients responsive to beta-blockers versus calcium channel blockers?
Observational (n=156)
Do clinical and ECG characteristics differ between idiopathic PVC patients responsive to beta-blockers versus calcium channel blockers?
p-value: p=<0.001
Clinical and ECG parameters such as sex, LVEF, heart rate, PVC burden, QRS duration, and coupling interval variability may help guide the initial choice between beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers for idiopathic PVCs.
May inform initial beta-blocker vs calcium channel blocker selection in idiopathic PVCs; leaves open prospective validation of predictive utility.
Objective: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) are a common arrhythmic condition. The first approach in patients with symptomatic and frequent PVC is medical treatment, primarily beta-blockers (BB) or calcium channel blockers (CCB), but it is still unclear which of the two should be chosen. This study investigated which drug treatment would be beneficial according to patient and electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics in patients with idiopathic PVC. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 156 patients with PVC who came to the cardiology outpatient clinic. Seventy-one patients were responsive to BB, and 85 were responsive to CCB. Their demographic and ECG characteristics were compared. Results: The male ratio was higher (p<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Although the mean heart rate was higher in BB responders (p<0.001), the initial PVC burden was lower in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). The PVC QRS duration was longer in BB responders than in CCB responders (p<0.001). Similarly, the coupling interval variability was higher in BB responders (p=0.006). Conclusions: The evaluation of clinical and ECG parameters in patients with frequent idiopathic PVCs may determine whether BBs or CCBs should be chosen as initial treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings and establish their clinical applicability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BAYCAN et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (n=156). Beta-blockers vs. Calcium channel blockers was evaluated on Demographic and ECG characteristics associated with response to beta-blockers versus calcium channel blockers (p=<0.001). Beta-blocker responders had a higher male ratio, lower LVEF, higher heart rate, lower PVC burden, and longer QRS duration than calcium channel blocker responders (all p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: