This article presents a survey of ways of statistically modelling patterns of observer agreement and disagreement. Main emphasis is placed on modelling inter-observer agreement for categorical responses, both for nominal and ordinal response scales. Models discussed include (1) simple cell-probability models based on Cohen's kappa that focus on beyond-chance agreement, (2) loglinear models for square tables, such as quasi-independence and quasi-symmetry models, (3) latent class models that express the joint distribution between ratings as a mixture of clusters for homogeneous subjects, each cluster having the same 'true' rating, and 4) Rasch models, which decompose subject-by-observer rating distributions using observer and subject main effects. Models can address two distinct components of agreement--strength of association between ratings, and similarity of marginal distributions of the ratings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alan Agresti (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: