This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Suicide is a leading cause of death among youth, and rates continue to increase across the United States. Pediatric primary care providers (PCPs) are uniquely positioned to identify acute periods of increased suicidal ideation and provide timely intervention. Objective: The present study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of training and implementation of a primary care-adapted version of Safe Alternatives for Teens and Youth-Acute (SAFETY-A), a brief, strengths-based, cognitive-behaviorally oriented, family intervention for suicidal thoughts and behaviors in youth, among pediatric PCPs. Method: This multisite pilot study involved collaboration between eight Texas-based academic institutions who assisted with the recruitment and training of 68 PCPs. PCPs attended five SAFETY-A training sessions and completed self-report surveys for 6 months post-training. Results: uses per PCP = 6.9). However, PCPs found the SAFETY-A training schedule less feasible, with many PCPs unable to attend all five training sessions. Conclusions: Findings suggest that a tiered training structure allowing for more flexibility in training commitment might be more feasible for busy PCPs seeking training in SAFETY-A. Ongoing efforts to feasibly scale-up SAFETY-A training efforts across Texas incorporate these findings with the goal of making SAFETY-A training available to all PCPs across the state.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinciotti et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: