Key result
European Heart Journal employs rigorous peer and statistical review to ensure high-quality cardiovascular science.
This review outlines the rigorous editorial and peer-review standards of the European Heart Journal aimed at publishing high-quality cardiovascular science.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support clinician reliance on EHJ publications; leaves open independent validation of editorial standards' impact.
The aim of the European Heart Journal (EHJ) is to attract innovative, methodologically sound, and clinically relevant research manuscripts able to change clinical practice and/or substantially advance knowledge on cardiovascular diseases. As the reference journal in cardiovascular medicine, the EHJ is committed to publishing only the best cardiovascular science adhering to the highest ethical principles. EHJ uses highly rigorous peer-review, critical statistical review and the highest quality editorial process, to ensure the novelty, accuracy, quality, and relevance of all accepted manuscripts with the aim of inspiring the clinical practice of EHJ readers and reducing the global burden of cardiovascular diseases. This review article summarizes the quality standards pursued by the EHJ to fulfill its mission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfonso et al. (2021) conducted a review in Cardiovascular diseases. The European Heart Journal pursues rigorous peer-review, statistical review, and editorial processes to ensure the publication of high-quality cardiovascular science.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: