Key result
Epicardial substrate ablation cuts VF or death by ~71% vs control in symptomatic Brugada syndrome.
Why the study?
Catheter ablation is a promising treatment to prevent ventricular fibrillation in Brugada syndrome, but evidence from a prospective, randomized clinical trial is lacking.
Does catheter ablation reduce the first occurrence of ventricular fibrillation or death in patients with symptomatic Brugada syndrome and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
RCT (n=50)
Open-label
1:1
Yes
Does catheter ablation reduce the first occurrence of ventricular fibrillation or death in patients with symptomatic Brugada syndrome and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Effect estimate: HR 0.288
p-value: p=0.0184
Epicardial substrate ablation significantly reduces VF recurrence in symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients with ICDs, providing the first randomized evidence for this therapy.
Supports epicardial ablation to reduce VF or death in symptomatic Brugada syndrome; provides first randomized evidence for this therapy.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has emerged as a promising treatment to prevent ventricular fibrillation (VF) in Brugada syndrome (BrS). However, evidence from a prospective, randomized clinical trial is lacking. OBJECTIVE: The Brugada Syndrome Ablation for the Prevention of Ventricular Fibrillation Episodes trial is a prospective, multicenter, 2-arm, randomized (1:1), open-label clinical study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ablation therapy in patients with symptomatic BrS. METHODS: We enrolled patients with symptomatic BrS with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients were randomized to ablation therapy or control groups. Ablation targeted arrhythmogenic areas identified through electroanatomical mapping, predominantly at the right ventricular epicardium. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of VF or death. One interim analysis was planned after 50 patients were randomized. RESULTS: Of 67 patients screened, 52 were randomized (25 to ablation, 25 to control, 2 withdrawals), and 15 declined randomizations but remained in a registry (10 chose ablation, 5 opted against ablation). After 3 years of follow-up, the ablation group had significantly fewer VF events than the control group (hazard ratio, 0.288; P = .0184). At the interim analysis, the Data Safety Monitoring Board recommended early trial termination. Among all ablation recipients (including crossovers and registry participants), 83% remained VF free after a single procedure and 90% after a repeat ablation. Complications of ablation included 1 hemopericardium without a long-term sequel. CONCLUSION: Epicardial substrate ablation significantly reduces VF recurrence in patients with symptomatic BrS with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and seems safe, supporting its potential role as a first-line therapy to prevent recurrent VF in patients with symptomatic BrS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nademanee et al. (2025) conducted an RCT in Symptomatic Brugada syndrome (n=50). Epicardial substrate ablation vs. Control was evaluated on First occurrence of ventricular fibrillation or death (HR 0.288, p=0.0184). Epicardial substrate ablation significantly reduced the first occurrence of ventricular fibrillation or death compared to control in symptomatic Brugada syndrome patients (HR 0.288; P=0.0184).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: