Key result
The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent did not significantly reduce target-vessel failure at 9 months compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent (11.9% vs 14.5%, P=0.12).
Why the study?
Does the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent reduce target-vessel failure compared to the stainless steel ML PENTA stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
RCT (n=1,043)
Blinded
Yes
Does the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent reduce target-vessel failure compared to the stainless steel ML PENTA stent in patients with de novo coronary lesions?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.9% vs 14.5%
p-value: p=0.12
The non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent decreased neointimal proliferation but failed to significantly reduce the primary endpoint of target-vessel failure compared with a bare-metal stent.
No clinical benefit with ACHIEVE stent over bare-metal; challenges non-polymer paclitaxel elution for de novo lesions.
BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing compound with potent antitumor activity, has been shown to inhibit smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration. The DELIVER trial was a prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical evaluation of the non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent compared with the stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 1043 patients with focal de novo coronary lesions, <25 mm in length, in 2.5- to 4.0-mm vessels were randomized (ACHIEVE n=524; ML PENTA n=519). Angiographic follow-up was performed in a subset of 442 patients (ACHIEVE n=228; ML PENTA n=214). Prespecified end points were a 40% reduction in target-vessel failure at 9 months (primary clinical end point) and a 50% reduction in binary restenosis at 8 months (major secondary end point). Baseline clinical characteristics were comparable between the groups. Patients in ACHIEVE had more type C lesions and a larger reference diameter. At follow-up, stent late loss was 0.81 versus 0.98 mm (P=0.003), stent binary restenosis was 14.9% versus 20.6% (P=0.076), and target-vessel failure was 11.9% versus 14.5% (P=0.12) for ACHIEVE and ML PENTA, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent decreased neointimal proliferation compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent; however, this reduction was insufficient to meet the prespecified primary end point of target-vessel failure and the secondary end point of binary restenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lansky et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in De novo coronary lesions (n=1,043). Non-polymer-based paclitaxel-coated ACHIEVE stent vs. Stainless steel Multi-Link (ML) PENTA stent was evaluated on Target-vessel failure at 9 months (p=0.12). The ACHIEVE paclitaxel-coated stent did not significantly reduce target-vessel failure at 9 months compared with the bare-metal PENTA stent (11.9% vs 14.5%, P=0.12).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: