PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 24, 2017AJP Cell Physiology16 citationsOpen Access

Stretch activation properties of Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscle suggest similar calcium-dependent mechanisms

BGBernadette M. GlasheenCECatherine C. EldredLSLeah C. Sullivan

Key Result

Drosophila indirect flight muscle exhibited 9-fold faster stretch activation tension generation compared to Lethocerus, while Lethocerus generated 5- to 10-fold higher tension, yielding similar power.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscle (IFM) models
I
Intervention
Exposure to two different fiber bathing solutions with varying calcium concentrations
C
Comparator
Comparison between Drosophila and Lethocerus IFMs across the two bathing solutions
O
Outcome
Stretch activation characteristics including isometric tension, SA tension, rate of SA tension generation, and maximum power outputsurrogate

Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscles share similar calcium-dependent stretch activation mechanisms despite differing tension and kinetic properties, suggesting a common evolutionary mechanism.

Abstract

Muscle stretch activation (SA) is critical for optimal cardiac and insect indirect flight muscle (IFM) power generation. The SA mechanism has been investigated for decades with many theories proposed, but none proven. One reason for the slow progress could be that multiple SA mechanisms may have evolved in multiple species or muscle types. Laboratories studying IFM SA in the same or different species have reported differing SA functional properties which would, if true, suggest divergent mechanisms. However, these conflicting results might be due to different experimental methodologies. Thus, we directly compared SA characteristics of IFMs from two SA model systems, Drosophila and Lethocerus, using two different fiber bathing solutions. Compared with Drosophila IFM, Lethocerus IFM isometric tension is 10- or 17-fold higher and SA tension was 5- or 10-fold higher, depending on the bathing solution. However, the rate of SA tension generation was 9-fold faster for Drosophila IFM. The inverse differences between rate and tension in the two species causes maximum power output to be similar, where Drosophila power is optimized in the bathing solution that favors faster muscle kinetics and Lethocerus in the solution that favors greater tension generation. We found that isometric tension and SA tension increased with calcium concentration for both species in both solutions, reaching a maximum plateau around pCa 5.0. Our results favor a similar mechanism for both species, perhaps involving a troponin complex that does not fully calcium activate the thin filament thus leaving room for further tension generation by SA.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Glasheen et al. (2017) studied Muscle stretch activation. Drosophila indirect flight muscle vs. Lethocerus indirect flight muscle was evaluated on Isometric tension and stretch activation tension generation. Drosophila indirect flight muscle exhibited 9-fold faster stretch activation tension generation compared to Lethocerus, while Lethocerus generated 5- to 10-fold higher tension, yielding similar power.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a15fc57a215942ca9e3f4cbhttps://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00110.2017
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper