This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
As dynamic collaborations between networks of specialists have become more central to developing cutting‐edge innovations, designing and sustaining innovation policies that foster them has become an increasingly central concern. This article reviews the characteristics of the “developmental network” or “neo‐developmental” states that have been shown to foster innovations at the technological horizon. It then analyzes the US case to suggest why some developmental network approaches to governance have proven relatively durable, while others have not. We conclude with a discussion of what can – and cannot – be learned from the US case, and suggest the importance of comparative work on the sustainability of effective innovation‐centered approaches to governance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Keller et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: