Key result
In a computational model of atrial fibrillation, basket catheter-based phase mapping detected true rotors 35-94% of the time depending on position, but consistently generated phantom rotors.
Why the study?
Does virtual multiple-electrode basket catheter mapping accurately detect rotors in a 3D computational model of atrial fibrillation?
Does virtual multiple-electrode basket catheter mapping accurately detect rotors in a 3D computational model of atrial fibrillation?
In computer simulations, basket catheter-based phase mapping detected true rotors but also generated phantom rotors due to far-field sources and interpolation, which may mislead AF ablation procedures.
Basket mapping may mislead rotor-guided AF ablation; leaves open phase-mapping accuracy pending clinical validation.
Anatomically based procedures to ablate atrial fibrillation (AF) are often successful in terminating paroxysmal AF. However, the ability to terminate persistent AF remains disappointing. New mechanistic approaches use multiple-electrode basket catheter mapping to localize and target AF drivers in the form of rotors but significant concerns remain about their accuracy. We aimed to evaluate how electrode-endocardium distance, far-field sources and inter-electrode distance affect the accuracy of localizing rotors. Sustained rotor activation of the atria was simulated numerically and mapped using a virtual basket catheter with varying electrode densities placed at different positions within the atrial cavity. Unipolar electrograms were calculated on the entire endocardial surface and at each of the electrodes. Rotors were tracked on the interpolated basket phase maps and compared with the respective atrial voltage and endocardial phase maps, which served as references. Rotor detection by the basket maps varied between 35-94% of the simulation time, depending on the basket's position and the electrode-to-endocardial wall distance. However, two different types of phantom rotors appeared also on the basket maps. The first type was due to the far-field sources and the second type was due to interpolation between the electrodes; increasing electrode density decreased the incidence of the second but not the first type of phantom rotors. In the simulations study, basket catheter-based phase mapping detected rotors even when the basket was not in full contact with the endocardial wall, but always generated a number of phantom rotors in the presence of only a single real rotor, which would be the desired ablation target. Phantom rotors may mislead and contribute to failure in AF ablation procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martínez-Mateu et al. (2018) studied Atrial fibrillation. Virtual multiple-electrode basket catheter mapping vs. Atrial voltage and endocardial phase maps was evaluated on Rotor detection accuracy. In a computational model of atrial fibrillation, basket catheter-based phase mapping detected true rotors 35-94% of the time depending on position, but consistently generated phantom rotors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: