Key result
Mavacamten boosts NYHA class improvement by ~115% in HCM without increasing serious adverse events.
Why the study?
The safety and efficacy of mavacamten in symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had not been well studied in a pooled meta-analysis.
Does Mavacamten improve functional status and symptoms in patients with symptomatic Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Meta-Analysis (n=503)
Does Mavacamten improve functional status and symptoms in patients with symptomatic Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Effect estimate: RR 2.15
p-value: p=<0.0001
Mavacamten significantly improves functional status and symptoms in patients with symptomatic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy without increasing the risk of serious adverse events or atrial fibrillation.
Mavacamten improves NYHA class in symptomatic HCM without excess SAEs; reinforces pooled trial evidence for functional benefit.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant disorder with risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children and adolescents. Mavacamten, also referred to as MYK-461, a myosin inhibitor of cardiac myocytes is studied in symptomatic HCM. The safety and efficacy of this medication is not well studied in pooled meta -analysis. Online database search was performed from inception to September 2023. We selected randomized clinical trials that compared Mavacamten with placebo/guideline medical treatment for HCM. We studied safety outcomes (Serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment emergent adverse events (TEAs) and Atrial fibrillation). Functional status of patients was assessed as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification improvement of at least + 1 grade, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) change from baseline). Relative risk ratios were used in randomized model using Review Manager Version 5.4 statistical software. A total of 4 RCTs comprising 503 patients were included in meta -analysis. On random effect model, we found that HCM patients that received Mavacamten had significant symptomatic improvement as depicted by improvement in NYHA class by at least + 1 grade (RR = 2.15; P < 0.0001) and KCCQ CSS score improvement (MD = 8.38; P < 0.00001) as compared to placebo arm. There was no statistically significant difference in SAEs (RR = 0.87; P = 0.69) and atrial fibrillation onset (RR = 0.80; P = 0.73) between HCM and placebo arm. The studies had low heterogeneity/publication bias. Mavacamten can improve symptoms in HCM patients, and can be additive to other alternative regimen in HCM patients with no statistical significance of risk of SAE or atrial fibrillation onset as compared to placebo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ullah et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in Symptomatic Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) (n=503). Mavacamten vs. Placebo or guideline medical treatment was evaluated on NYHA class improvement of at least + 1 grade (RR 2.15, p=<0.0001). Mavacamten significantly improved symptoms in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, including NYHA class improvement (RR 2.15, P<0.0001), with no significant increase in serious adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: