Key result
Mavacamten was associated with higher rates of ≥1 NYHA class improvement (RR 2.20; 95% CI 1.48-3.28) and improved KCCQ-CSS scores and LVOT gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Why the study?
The efficacy and safety profile of mavacamten for the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was not well-established.
Does mavacamten improve symptoms, functional status, and LVOT gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Meta-Analysis (n=503)
Does mavacamten improve symptoms, functional status, and LVOT gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Relative Risk: 2.2 (95% CI 1.48–3.28)
Mavacamten significantly improves symptoms, functional status, and LVOT gradients while reducing the need for septal reduction therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Supports mavacamten incorporation into HCM care; confirms pooled RCT benefits on symptoms and gradients.
The efficacy and safety profile of mavacamten, a cardiac myosin inhibitor for the treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is not well-established, prompting the need for an updated meta-analysis. The authors conducted an extensive search across multiple electronic databases, including Embase, MEDLINE (via Pubmed), and CENTRAL, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy and safety of mavacamten in HCM. Review Manager 5.4 (Revman) was employed to pool risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD). Our literature search yielded 4 RCTs with a total of 503 patients. Mavacamten was found to be associated with higher rates of greater than or equal to 1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement (RR 2.20, 95% CI: 1.48–3.28; I 2 =51%) and change from baseline in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire- Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) (MD 7.50, 95% CI: 3.44–11.55; I 2 =50%). Mavacamten was also associated with improved resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient (MD −38.33, 95% CI: −49.38 to −27.28; I 2 =75%), Valsalva LVOT gradient (MD −48.08, 95% CI: −62.21 to −33.96; I 2 =78%), post-exercise LVOT gradient (MD −37.1, 95% CI: −44.37 to −29.84; I 2 =0%), LVMI (MD −16.91, 95% CI: −28.29 to −5.54; I 2 =88%), and lower rates of septal reduction therapy (SRT) (RR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.22–0.40; I 2 =0%). There were no significant differences between mavacamten and placebo regarding the composite functional outcome, greater than or equal to 1 treatment-emergent adverse event, greater than or equal to 1 serious adverse event, and atrial fibrillation. The authors; findings suggest that mavacamten contributes to improvements in NYHA class, KCCQ-CSS scores, and LVOT gradients while reducing the incidence of SRT in patients with HCM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Almansouri et al. (2024) conducted a meta-analysis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=503). mavacamten vs. placebo was evaluated on greater than or equal to 1 New York Heart Association (NYHA) class improvement (RR 2.20, 95% CI 1.48-3.28). Mavacamten was associated with higher rates of ≥1 NYHA class improvement (RR 2.20; 95% CI 1.48-3.28) and improved KCCQ-CSS scores and LVOT gradients in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: