Magnetic resonance imaging had a higher sensitivity (100%) in the detection of abnormal muscles in acute rhabdomyolysis compared with computed tomography (62%) and ultrasonography (42%).
Observational (n=15)
Does magnetic resonance imaging improve the detection of abnormal muscles compared to computed tomography and ultrasonography in patients with acute rhabdomyolysis?
MRI is highly sensitive (100%) for detecting abnormal muscles in acute rhabdomyolysis, outperforming CT and US, and is valuable for guiding surgical fasciotomy.
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 62%
Fifteen patients with acute rhabdomyolysis were evaluated with low field magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and the results compared with those obtained using computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US). With MR imaging, abnormal muscles with areas of increased signal intensity were seen in every patient, which probably reflects increased water content or increased mobility of water molecules caused by inflammatory reaction and oedema in the injured and necrotic muscles. Computed tomography without intravenous contrast medium demonstrated abnormal muscles in most patients examined with this modality. The CT findings consisted of areas of focal hypodensity in muscles. With US, abnormal muscles were seen in less than half of the patients studied. The normal structure of striated muscle was focally disturbed and areas of both decreased and increased echogenicity were found. Magnetic resonance imaging had a higher sensitivity in the detection of abnormal muscles than CT or US (100%, 62% and 42%, respectively). The findings of all these modalities are non-specific, but together with the clinical and laboratory data they confirm the diagnosis of rhabdomyolysis. The information gained from imaging studies is useful in the assessment of the extent and distribution of rhabdomyolysis. The precise identification of affected muscle compartments by MR imaging is valuable when surgical fasciotomy is considered for treatment; the procedure can then be appropriately directed to the compartments with clearly abnormal muscles.
Lamminen et al. (Sat,) conducted a observational in Acute rhabdomyolysis (n=15). Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging vs. Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) was evaluated on Sensitivity in the detection of abnormal muscles. Magnetic resonance imaging had a higher sensitivity (100%) in the detection of abnormal muscles in acute rhabdomyolysis compared with computed tomography (62%) and ultrasonography (42%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: