PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 10, 2010EP Europace46 citationsOpen Access

The impact of statins and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers on pulmonary vein antrum isolation outcomes in post-menopausal females

View Full Paper
DPDimpi PatelNational Jewish HealthPMPrasant MohantyElectrophysiology
Luigi Di Biase
Luigi Di BiaseElectrophysiology

Key Result

Treatment with statins or RAAS inhibitors did not improve catheter ablation success rates compared to controls (70.6% statins, 65.4% RAAS vs 68.8% control; statin HR 1.26, P=0.282).

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=372)

Structured PICO

Does treatment with statins or RAAS inhibitors reduce atrial fibrillation recurrence in post-menopausal females undergoing catheter ablation?

P
Population
372 post-menopausal females who underwent atrial fibrillation catheter ablation
I
Intervention
Statins or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors
C
Comparator
No statins or RAAS inhibitors (control population)
O
Outcome
Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation recurrence rates (procedural success)hard clinical

Treatment with statins or RAAS inhibitors does not improve catheter ablation success rates for atrial fibrillation in post-menopausal females.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.26

Absolute Event Rate: 70.6% vs 68.8%

p-value: p=0.282

Abstract

AIMS: To assess whether treatment with statins or renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors as potential procedural 'augmenting agents' improved atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation recurrence rates in post-menopausal females (PMFS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Five hundred and eighteen consecutive female patients had undergone AF catheter ablation from January 2005 to May 2008. Post-menopausal females were selected and procedure outcomes were compared between cohorts of PMFS treated with statins or RAAS inhibitors to untreated PMFS. Out of 408 PMFS, 36 (8.8%) were treated with a combination of RAAS inhibitors and statins, thus were excluded leaving a total of 372 (91.2%) patients in the study. Out of 372 patients, 111 (29.8%) were on statins (Group 1), 59 (15.9%) on RAAS inhibitors (Group 2), and 202 (54.3%) without RAAS inhibitors or statins (Group 3) control population. Over a mean follow-up time of 24 +/- 8.3 (median 25) months, 78 (70.6%) in Group 1, 38 (65.4%) in Group 2, and 139 (68.8%) in Group 3 had procedural success. Statin or RAAS inhibitor use did not predict lower recurrence rates hazard ratio (HR): 1.26, P = 0.282 and HR: 1.14, P = 0.728, respectively. When compared with controls, no difference in the cumulative incidence of recurrence was found with statin or RAAS inhibitors use (P = 0.385 and P = 0.761, respectively). CONCLUSION: Treatment with statins or RAAS inhibitors did not improve catheter ablation success rates among PMFS. Thereby, from a clinical standpoint, PMFS should not be started on these treatments as a procedural 'augmenting agent' at this time.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=372). Statins or RAAS inhibitors vs. No statins or RAAS inhibitors was evaluated on Procedural success (freedom from recurrence) (HR 1.26, p=0.282). Treatment with statins or RAAS inhibitors did not improve catheter ablation success rates compared to controls (70.6% statins, 65.4% RAAS vs 68.8% control; statin HR 1.26, P=0.282).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a161bd0b15b679967196635https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup387
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper