Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
For a braided tensor category C and a subcategory K there is a notion of a centralizer CC K, which is a full tensor subcategory of C. A pre-modular tensor category is known to be modular in the sense of Turaev if and only if the center Z2C≡ CCC (not to be confused with the center Z1 of a tensor category, related to the quantum double) is trivial, that is, consists only of multiples of the tensor unit, and dimC ≠ 0. Here dim C = ∑ i d ( X i ) 2 , the Xi being the simple objects. We prove several structural properties of modular categories. Our main technical tool is the following double centralizer theorem. Let C be a modular category and K a full tensor subcategory closed with respect to direct sums, subobjects and duals. Then CCCCK = K and dim K·dim CCK = dim C. We give several applications. (1) If C is modular and K is a full modular subcategory, then L=CCK is also modular and C is equivalent as a ribbon category to the direct product: C ≃ K ⊠ L . Thus every modular category factorizes (non-uniquely, in general) into prime modular categories. We study the prime factorizations of the categories D(G)-Mod, where G is a finite abelian group. (2) If C is a modular *-category and K is a full tensor subcategory then dim C ⩾ dim K · dim Z2K. We give examples where the bound is attained and conjecture that every pre-modular K can be embedded fully into a modular category C with dim C=dim K·dim Z2K. (3) For every finite group G there is a braided tensor *-category C such that Z2C≃Rep,G and the modular closure/modularization C is non-trivial. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification 18D10.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Müger (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: