Key result
Common microbial indicators fail to predict norovirus and hepatitis A in agricultural environments.
Why the study?
Indicators of fecal contamination may be used as a proxy to evaluate the potential presence of human pathogens, but whether norovirus or hepatitis A is associated with microbial indicators in agricultural samples was unclear.
Systematic Review (n=15)
Effect estimate: Kappa 0.09 (95% CI -0.05, 0.23)
Common indicator organisms are not strong predictors of the presence of norovirus and hepatitis A virus in the agricultural environment.
Standard microbial indicators may underestimate viral risks in agriculture; challenges their predictive validity and extends calls for virus-specific monitoring research.
Fresh-produce consumers may be at risk of pathogen infection due to fecal contamination of the agricultural environment. Indicators of fecal contamination may be used as a proxy to evaluate the potential presence of human pathogens, such as norovirus and hepatitis A, on agricultural samples. The objective of this systematic review was to determine whether the presence of human norovirus or hepatitis A was associated with microbial indicators in agricultural samples including fresh produce, equipment surfaces, and hands. Four databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Agricola) were systematically searched and fifteen articles met inclusion and exclusion criteria. After data extraction, individual indicator-pathogen relationships were assessed using Cohen’s Kappa coefficient. The level of agreement between norovirus with adenovirus was 0.09 (n = 16, 95% CI −0.05, 0.23), indicating poor agreement using Landis and Koch’s criterion. Similarly, the Kappa coefficient between norovirus with E. coli (κ = 0.04, n = 14, 95% CI −0.05, 0.49) or total coliforms (κ = 0.03, n = 4, 95% CI −0.01, 0.02) was also poor. The level of agreement between hepatitis A with adenovirus (κ = −0.03, n = 3, 95% CI −0.06, 0.01) or fecal coliforms (κ = 0, n = 1, 95% CI 0, 0) was also poor. There were moderate relationships between hepatitis A with E. coli (κ = 0.49, n = 3, 95% CI 0.28, 0.70) and total coliforms (κ = 0.47, n = 2, 95% CI 0.47, 0.47). Based on these limited results, common indicator organisms are not strong predictors of the presence of norovirus and hepatitis A virus in the agricultural environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Victor et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Fecal contamination of agricultural environment (Norovirus and Hepatitis A) (n=15). Microbial indicators (e.g., adenovirus, E. coli, coliforms) vs. Presence of human norovirus or hepatitis A was evaluated on Agreement between norovirus and adenovirus (Cohen's Kappa coefficient) (Kappa 0.09, 95% CI -0.05, 0.23). Common microbial indicator organisms are not strong predictors of norovirus and hepatitis A in agricultural environments, demonstrating poor agreement (e.g., norovirus and adenovirus κ=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: