Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved subjective health status at 1-year follow-up in overweight patients (OR 5.1) compared to no rehabilitation, but not in normal-weight or obese patients.
Why the study?
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve subjective health status in patients post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention across different BMI categories?
Cohort (n=357)
No
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve subjective health status in patients post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention across different BMI categories?
Effect estimate: OR 5.1 (95% CI 2.1-12.5)
Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improves subjective health status in overweight patients post-pPCI, but not in normal-weight or obese patients, suggesting a need for tailored programs for the obese.
May support tailored cardiac rehabilitation for overweight post-pPCI patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice across BMI groups.
PURPOSE: The association between body mass index (BMI) and subjective health status before and after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) and 1 year later was compared in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) who did (CR group) and did not receive CR (no-CR group). The aim was to investigate the association between BMI and subjective health status based on the Short Form-12 questionnaire. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2011, 242 patients with pPCI with an acute myocardial infarction completed a CR program and were compared with 115 patients in the no-CR group. All patients completed the Short Form-12 questionnaire at baseline, at 12 weeks, and at 1-year followup. The CR program consisted of a 2 sessions per week for 1.5 hours each for 12 weeks. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on BMI: normal weight, overweight, and obese. RESULTS: Compared with patients in the no-CR group, CR group patients in the overweight group significantly improved their subjective health status after CR and these improvements were sustained at 1-year followup. CR patients in the normal weight and obese groups did not significantly improve subjective health status. The overweight patients had the highest improvement in subjective health status (OR = 3.4 post-CR and 5.1 at 1 year of followup). CONCLUSIONS: After CR, overweight patients showed the best improvement in subjective health status. CR did not significantly improve subjective health status in normal-weight and obese patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pieters et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Acute myocardial infarction post-primary percutaneous coronary intervention (n=357). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. No cardiac rehabilitation was evaluated on Improvement in subjective health status (highest tertile) at 1-year follow-up in overweight patients (OR 5.1, 95% CI 2.1-12.5). Cardiac rehabilitation significantly improved subjective health status at 1-year follow-up in overweight patients (OR 5.1) compared to no rehabilitation, but not in normal-weight or obese patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: