Key result
Non-attendance at cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a higher risk of 14-year all-cause mortality compared to attendance (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.16-2.15).
Why the study?
Does attendance at cardiac rehabilitation reduce all-cause mortality in patients following myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, or percutaneous interventions?
Cohort (n=544)
Yes
Does attendance at cardiac rehabilitation reduce all-cause mortality in patients following myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery, or percutaneous interventions?
Effect estimate: HR 1.58 (95% CI 1.16-2.15)
Attendance at cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction or revascularization is associated with a significantly lower risk of long-term all-cause mortality.
Cardiac rehabilitation attendance may improve long-term survival post-MI or revascularization; extends observational data but leaves causal confirmation open.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether attendance at cardiac rehabilitation (CR) independently predicts all-cause mortality over 14 years and whether there is a dose-response relationship between the proportion of CR sessions attended and long-term mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: CR programmes in Victoria, Australia PATIENTS: The sample comprised 544 men and women eligible for CR following myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous interventions. Participants were tracked 4 months after hospital discharge to ascertain CR attendance status. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality at 14 years ascertained through linkage to the Australian National Death Index. RESULTS: In total, 281 (52%) men and women attended at least one CR session. There were few significant differences between non-attenders and attenders. After adjustment for age, sex, diagnosis, employment, diabetes and family history, the mortality risk for non-attenders was 58% greater than for attenders (HR=1.58, 95% CI 1.16 to 2.15). Participants who attended <25% of sessions had a mortality risk more than twice that of participants attending ≥ 75% of sessions (OR=2.57, 95% CI 1.04 to 6.38). This association was attenuated after adjusting for current smoking (OR=2.06, 95% CI 0.80 to 5.29). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides further evidence for the long-term benefits of CR in a contemporary, heterogeneous population. While a dose-response relationship may exist between the number of sessions attended and long-term mortality, this relationship does not occur independently of smoking differences. CR practitioners should encourage smokers to attend CR and provide support for smoking cessation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Beauchamp et al. (2012) conducted a cohort in Myocardial infarction, coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous interventions (n=544). Cardiac rehabilitation attendance vs. Non-attendance was evaluated on All-cause mortality at 14 years (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.16-2.15). Non-attendance at cardiac rehabilitation was associated with a higher risk of 14-year all-cause mortality compared to attendance (HR 1.58; 95% CI 1.16-2.15).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: