Key result
Radiofrequency ablation for ventricular arrhythmias achieves ~99% acute success in children under 4, matching older cohorts.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare clinical characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias in younger versus older children and evaluate the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation in young children.
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation have similar safety and efficacy in younger (<4 years) compared to older (≥4 years) children with ventricular arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=762)
No
Does radiofrequency catheter ablation have similar safety and efficacy in younger (<4 years) compared to older (≥4 years) children with ventricular arrhythmias?
Absolute Event Rate: 99% vs 98.6%
p-value: p=0.999
Radiofrequency catheter ablation is a safe and effective therapeutic option for drug-resistant ventricular arrhythmias in children under 4 years of age, with acute success and complication rates comparable to those in older children.
Supports RFCA for drug-resistant VA in children <4 years; extends observational data but requires randomized confirmation.
Background and Aims: To compare the clinical characteristics of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in younger vs. older children, and to explore the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in the treatment of VAs in young children. Methods: General data, surgical data, and prognosis of all children with VAs who underwent RFCA at our hospital between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2022 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: younger (<4 years); and older (≥4 years). Results: Data from 762 children with VAs were analysed, including 96 younger children (3.47 ± 0.75 years, 16.74 ± 3.98 kg) and 666 older children (9.44 ± 2.86 years, 38.85 ± 15.11 kg). Compared with the older group, there were more premature ventricular beats with ventricular tachycardia, earlier surgery, and more ablations under x-ray fluoroscopy in the younger group. The right ventricular outflow tract was the most common arrhythmia focus in both groups, followed by the tricuspid annulus in the younger group and the left ventricular septum in the older group. The acute success rates for younger and older children were 99.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The recurrence and complication rates in the two groups were similar, and there was no significant difference in radiation dose. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of RFCA in the treatment of younger children with VAs were similar to those of older children. RFCA appears to be a viable therapeutic option for young children with drug-resistant VAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Ventricular arrhythmias (n=762). Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in younger children (<4 years) vs. Radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) in older children (≥4 years) was evaluated on Acute success rate (p=0.999). Radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in younger children (<4 years) achieved a 99.0% acute success rate, which was comparable to the 98.6% success rate observed in older children.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: