Key result
Rate-responsive pacing produced significantly greater long-term heart rate variability compared to fixed-rate pacing (SDANN P=0.0001), but did not reproduce short-term HRV measures.
Why the study?
Does rate-responsive pacing reproduce long-term heart rate variability compared to fixed-rate or atrially tracked pacing in patients with complete heart block?
RCT (n=10)
Cross-over
Does rate-responsive pacing reproduce long-term heart rate variability compared to fixed-rate or atrially tracked pacing in patients with complete heart block?
Rate-responsive pacing reproduces long-term measures of HRV, indicating they may serve as markers of heart rate responses to patient activity rather than purely autonomic origins.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rate-responsive pacing better restores long-term HRV than fixed-rate in complete heart block; confirms these measures reflect activity responses rather than autonomic tone alone.
INTRODUCTION: Long-term heart rate variability (HRV) measures, including the standard deviation of means of successive 5-minute epochs of R-R interval intervals (SDANN) and the power law slope (beta), are important prognostic measures, yet their physiologic basis is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that long-term HRV arises from physical activity in a randomized cross-over study in patients with rate-responsive pacemakers. METHODS AND RESULTS: Ten patients with complete heart block and dual-chamber pacemakers underwent 24-hour periods of ambulatory ECG in each of three pacing modes: atrially tracked, fixed-rate, and rate-responsive pacing. SDANN, ultra low frequency (ULF; frequencies <0.0033 Hz), and beta slope were calculated; and high-frequency power and root mean square of consecutive normal R-R intervals (rMSSD) were calculated as measures of short-term HRV, which have autonomic origins. Long-term HRV measures were similar with atrially tracked and rate-responsive pacing and were much greater than in fixed-rate pacing (SDANN P = 0.0001; ULF P = 0.0001; beta slope P = 0.0002). Short-term HRV measures were similarly low in fixed-rate and rate-responsive pacing (P = NS) and were significantly lower than with atrially tracked pacing (P = 0.0034). CONCLUSION: Rate-responsive pacing reproduces long-term, but not short-term, measures of HRV, suggesting that they may be markers of heart rate responses to patient activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Raj et al. (2004) conducted an RCT in Complete heart block (n=10). Rate-responsive pacing vs. Fixed-rate pacing and atrially tracked pacing was evaluated on Long-term heart rate variability (SDANN, ULF, and beta slope) (p=0.0001). Rate-responsive pacing produced significantly greater long-term heart rate variability compared to fixed-rate pacing (SDANN P=0.0001), but did not reproduce short-term HRV measures.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: