Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The first stage of a long-term, cyclic evaluation of one secondary school's introduction of a cognitive skills development programme into its mainstream curriculum is described. A traditional research design is rejected in favour of a more open-ended, semi-structured framework for evaluation within which aspects of the setting, the plans, the action and initial results are scrutinized. Important issues are raised about what might be considered positive outcomes of cognitive interventions and how these can be achieved. The broader and more long-term aspects of evaluation are also emphasized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burden et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: