Key result
Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) reaches an accuracy of 90% for topical diagnostics of arrhythmogenic foci, though it remains inferior to invasive intracardiac mapping.
Why the study?
Preprocedure topical diagnostics of cardiac arrhythmias remains fundamentally important, but non-invasive electrophysiology imaging is still inferior to invasive electrophysiological examination, highlighting the demand for integrated hybrid mapping systems.
Does non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) accurately locate arrhythmogenic foci compared to invasive mapping?
Does non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) accurately locate arrhythmogenic foci compared to invasive mapping?
Hybrid systems combining non-invasive and invasive electrophysiological mapping are needed to improve the accuracy and safety of arrhythmia ablation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
NICE may aid pre-procedural planning for arrhythmia ablation; leaves open whether hybrid non-invasive-invasive systems can improve precision and safety.
Heart arrhythmias may accompany virtually any cardiac disease. The problem of the preprocedure topical diagnostics of various arrhythmias remains fundamentally important and relevant, which is confirmed by numerous algorithms aimed at non-invasive detection of the arrhythmogenic focus location. Today, many different methods are available for non-invasive topical diagnostics of the arrhythmogenic foci in both ventricular and atrial arrhythmias. A non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE), based on the solution of the inverse problem of the electrocardiography, is the most advanced new technology. The accuracy of NICE reaches 90%, however, it is still inferior in its capabilities to the “reference” method of the invasive intracardiac electrophysiological examination. Currently, the market presents devices for both invasive mapping and NICE. However, in the context of surgery, an integrated system of non-invasive electrophysiological mapping with invasive three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping is of high demand. The creation of hybrid systems will allow to visualize electrophysiological processes in the epi- and endocardial surface in the real time with very high accuracy and to carry out the radiofrequency catheter ablation of arrhythmias with the simultaneous reduction of the radiation load on the patient and medical personnel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Хлынин et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cardiac arrhythmias. Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) vs. Invasive intracardiac electrophysiological examination was evaluated on Accuracy of arrhythmogenic focus location detection. Non-invasive imaging of cardiac electrophysiology (NICE) reaches an accuracy of 90% for topical diagnostics of arrhythmogenic foci, though it remains inferior to invasive intracardiac mapping.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: