Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to suggest an appropriate regulatory regime in a context of firm asymmetry, this study has developed a mathematical model that allows to elucidate comparisons of three different regulatory scenarios. In the unregulated market, the low-cost firm is more likely to become dominant in the market. Symmetric regulation has an immediate effect on off-net prices, which fall to the level of its marginal costs. Finally, asymmetric regulation is a highly effective way of promoting market entry. Asymmetric regulation can generate higher social welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexander Correa (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: