Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article argues that awareness of institutional context has been singularly lacking in the most influential areas of HRM. This lack of attention to external context has resulted in findings that fail to reflect reality. We offer a layered contextual framework embedded in economic institutional theory. We propose that it forms the basis of a comparative research agenda for HRM. We validate the framework using extant publications on institutionally based comparative HRM, drawing on findings from the Cranet research network published in the decade 2007–2017.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gooderham et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: