Key result
Preoperative serum albumin predicts surgical site infection following laparotomy with fair accuracy, outperforming CRP.
Why the study?
Postoperative SSI following laparotomy remains a major concern, and controversy exists regarding the role of preoperative serum albumin and CRP levels as predictors of SSI.
Do preoperative serum albumin and CRP levels predict postoperative surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy?
Cohort (n=61)
No
Do preoperative serum albumin and CRP levels predict postoperative surgical site infection in patients undergoing laparotomy?
Preoperative serum albumin is a fair, cost-effective predictor of surgical site infection following laparotomy, whereas CRP has limited utility in this setting.
Preoperative albumin may aid SSI risk stratification after laparotomy; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
A bstract Background: Postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) following laparotomy remains a problem of global concern with local studies reporting higher rates in comparison with more developed climes. Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) and albumin levels have been noted to play an important role in the peri-operative period. However, some controversy still exists on their role as SSI predictors in the preoperative setting. Objective: To determine the usefulness of preoperative serum levels of albumin and CRP as predictors of SSI in patients undergoing laparotomy at a tertiary healthcare center in Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This was a hospital-based prospective observational cohort study conducted at the general surgery units of the study center from June 2021 to June 2022. Results: Twenty-two (36.1%) patients developed postoperative SSI in this study. There was a significant difference in the preoperative albumin levels between the patients who developed SSI and those who did not (36.80 ± 9.11 vs. 42.83 ± 9.39; P = 0.018). Preoperative serum albumin showed a fair predictive accuracy with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54–0.82; P = 0.024). Preoperative serum CRP, however, showed no significant difference between both categories and equally displayed poor accuracy with an AUC of 0.50 (95% CI = 0.34–0.64; P = 0.89). Conclusion: Preoperative serum albumin was significantly associated with SSI and showed a fair predictive accuracy in forecasting the development of post-laparotomy SSI. Preoperative serum albumin levels remain a good, simple, and cost-effective tool to predict SSI in contaminated major abdominal surgeries. Preoperative serum CRP had only a limited application in this study cohort.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nwosu et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in patients undergoing laparotomy (n=61). Preoperative serum albumin and C-reactive protein (CRP) was evaluated on postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.54-0.82, p=0.024). Preoperative serum albumin showed fair predictive accuracy for postoperative surgical site infection following laparotomy (AUC 0.68; 95% CI 0.54–0.82; P=0.024), whereas CRP displayed poor accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: