Background: Disease surveillance and notification (DSN) is a core component of the Health Management Information System and is critical for early detection and control of epidemic-prone diseases. The effectiveness of DSN depends largely on the awareness, knowledge, and practices of frontline health workers at community and facility levels. Objective: This study aimed to assess awareness, knowledge, and practices related to DSN among village health workers (VHWs) and facility-based health workers in Ebonyi State, Nigeria, and to identify factors contributing to incomplete and delayed reporting. Materials and Methods: A mixed-methods descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted across all 13 Local Government Areas of Ebonyi State. Quantitative data were collected using pretested questionnaires administered to 385 VHWs and 323 facility-based health workers selected through random sampling. Qualitative data were obtained through a focus group discussion involving all 13 Disease Surveillance and Notification Officers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi-square tests. Results: Among VHWs, 68% were aware that diseases should be reported, but 57% could correctly state the purpose of reporting. Lower educational attainment was significantly associated with difficulty completing DSN reporting forms (odds ratio = 3.85; 95% confidence interval: 2.40–6.20; P <0.001). Among facility-based workers, 90% demonstrated awareness of DSN, but 51% correctly identified diseases on the routine notification list, and 47% were unfamiliar with standard case definitions. Qualitative findings highlighted inadequate financial incentives, irregular supply of DSN forms, and lack of feedback as major barriers to timely reporting. Conclusion: Despite high awareness, deficiencies in practical knowledge, logistics, and motivation limit optimal DSN performance. Strengthened training, reliable reporting tools, feedback mechanisms, and improved incentives may enhance surveillance effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nwaze et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: