Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Molecular investigations of riboswitches bound to small‐molecule effectors have produced a wealth of information on how these molecules achieve high affinity and specificity for a target ligand. X‐ray crystal structures have been determined for the ligand‐free state for representatives of the preQ 1 ‐I, S ‐adenosylmethionine I, lysine, and glycine aptamer classes. These structures in conjunction with complimentary techniques, such as in‐line probing, NMR spectroscopy, Förster resonance energy transfer, small‐angle scattering, and computational simulations, have demonstrated that riboswitches adopt multiple conformations in the absence of ligand. Despite a number of investigations that support ligand‐dependent folding, mounting evidence suggests that free‐state riboswitches interact with their effectors in the sub‐populations of largely prefolded states as embodied by the principle of conformational selection, which has been documented extensively for protein‐mediated ligand interactions. Fundamental riboswitch investigations of the bound and free states have advanced our understanding of RNA folding, ligand recognition, and how these factors culminate in communication between an aptamer and its expression platform. An understanding of these topics is essential to comprehend riboswitch gene regulation at the molecular level, which has already provided a basis to understand the mechanism of action of natural antimicrobials. WIREs RNA 2012, 3:369–384. doi: 10.1002/wrna.114. This article is categorized under: RNA Structure and Dynamics > Influence of RNA Structure in Biological Systems Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches > Riboswitches RNA Interactions with Proteins and Other Molecules > Small Molecule–RNA Interactions
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liberman et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: