Key result
Integrating cardiovascular biomarkers and non-invasive imaging in primary prevention may enhance the precision of subclinical disease detection and risk stratification.
Why the study?
Current primary prevention guidelines do not strongly support cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers for risk assessment, despite growing evidence of their prognostic value.
Does the use of cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers improve risk prediction in people without known cardiovascular disease?
Does the use of cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers improve risk prediction in people without known cardiovascular disease?
Integrating cardiovascular biomarkers and non-invasive imaging may enhance subclinical disease detection and risk stratification in primary prevention.
May support refined primary prevention risk stratification; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before practice change.
Introduction: Current primary prevention guidelines do not strongly support the use of cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers in risk assessment. Still, an increasing body of evidence suggests that important prognostic information can be obtained from imaging and biomarker measurements.Areas covered: In this review, we describe the most important imaging modalities (coronary computed tomography, myocardial perfusion imaging, carotid intima media thickness, echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging) and circulating biomarkers (cardiac troponins, B-type natriuretic peptides and C-reactive protein) for risk prediction in people without known cardiovascular disease. We discuss both the prognostic performance and clinical utility of these biomarkers in the era of primary prevention with increased focus on precision medicine. Finally, we comment on the use of cardiac biomarkers in screening for additional work-up with cardiac imaging and the combination of the entities in risk prediction.Expert opinion: We believe future primary prevention should, to a larger extent, integrate measurements of cardiovascular biomarkers and non-invasive imaging to enhance the precision of subclinical disease detection and risk stratification. The use of cardiovascular biomarkers as a screening tool for further testing with non-invasive imaging may be a cost-effective strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Myhre et al. (2019) conducted a review in Primary prevention in people without known cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular imaging and circulating biomarkers was evaluated. Integrating cardiovascular biomarkers and non-invasive imaging in primary prevention may enhance the precision of subclinical disease detection and risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: