Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this study was to investigate controlling coach behavior as a boundary condition for the relationship between a mastery climate, task goal orientation, and competence satisfaction in youth soccer. Latent conditional process modeling was conducted with a sample of 1,119 female and male youth soccer players 10–15 years of age. Results indicated that the interaction between controlling coach behavior and coach-created mastery climate accounted for 4% variance in task goal orientation. Furthermore, the indirect link between coach-created mastery climate and competence, through task goal orientation, was significant at all levels of controlling coach behavior, yet decreased from low (–1 SD; B =.40, 95% confidence interval [CIBC] [.28,.52]), to moderate (M; B =.35, 95% CIBC [.26,.46]), to high levels (+1 SD; B =.31, 95% CIBC [.22,.41]). Findings are interpreted as supporting the idea that controlling coach behavior abates the internalization of mastery values, thereby undermining the relationship between the coach-created mastery climate and players' competence satisfaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gjesdal et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: