Key result
Pharmacist-driven warfarin management linked to a ~26% absolute increase in TTR at one year.
Why the study?
No studies have evaluated whether the quality of pharmacist-driven warfarin therapy remains stable long-term after follow-up ends in patients with poor anticoagulation quality.
Does a 12-week pharmacist-driven warfarin therapy management program improve long-term Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in patients with atrial fibrillation and poor anticoagulation control?
Cohort (n=262)
No
Does a 12-week pharmacist-driven warfarin therapy management program improve long-term Time in Therapeutic Range (TTR) in patients with atrial fibrillation and poor anticoagulation control?
A 12-week pharmacist-driven intervention significantly improves and maintains long-term anticoagulation quality (TTR) in atrial fibrillation patients with previously poor control.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support pharmacist-led warfarin management for sustained TTR in AF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Warfarin is the most common oral anticoagulant drug, especially in low-income and emerging countries, because of the high cost of direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs), or when warfarin is the only proven therapy (mechanical prosthetic valve and kidney dysfunction). The quality of warfarin therapy is directly associated with dose management. Evidence shows that pharmaceutical care achieves a better quality of therapy with warfarin. However, there are no studies showing this intervention in a specific patient group with poor quality of anticoagulation in a long period after the end of the follow-up by a pharmacist. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the quality of warfarin therapy driven by a pharmacist remains stable in the long term after the end of follow up with a pharmacist, in AF patients with poor quality of anticoagulation. METHODS: This is a prospective study, which evaluated about 2,620 patients and selected 262 patients with AF and poor quality of anticoagulation therapy with warfarin (TTR<50% - based on the last three values of international normalized ratio). Pharmacist-driven therapy management was performed up to 12 weeks. Data from patients were evaluated 1 year after the end of the follow-up with pharmacist. RESULTS: Comparison between mean TTR after 12 weeks of pharmaceutical care (54.1%) and mean TTR one year after the end of the pharmaceutical care (56.5%; p=0.081) did not achieve statistical difference, demonstrating that the increment of quality due to intervention of 12 weeks was maintained for 1 year after intervention. CONCLUSION: The long-term impact of pharmaceutical care was beneficial for patients with AF and poor quality of warfarin anticoagulation. This design might be an important strategy to treat a subgroup of patients without proven effectiveness of warfarin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marcatto et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation with poor quality of anticoagulation therapy (n=262). Pharmacist-driven warfarin therapy management vs. Traditional warfarin therapy (1 year before intervention) was evaluated on Mean Time in the Therapeutic Range (TTR) 1 year after intervention vs 1 year before intervention (p=<0.001). Pharmacist-driven warfarin therapy management significantly increased mean Time in the Therapeutic Range from 30.7% at baseline to 56.5% one year after the 12-week intervention.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: