Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Very long (172 ks effective exposure time) observations of the BALQSO LBQS 2212-1759 with XMM-Newton yield a stringent upper-limit on its 0.2–10 keV (rest- frame 0.64–32.2 keV) flux, , while simultaneous UV and optical observations reveal a rather blue spectrum extending to 650 Åin the source rest frame. These results are used to set a tight upper-limit on its optical to X-ray spectral index . Given the HI-BAL nature of LBQS 212-1759, its X-ray weakness is most likely due to intrinsic absorption. If this is the case, and assuming that the intrinsic of LBQS 2212-1759 is -1.63 – a value appropriate for a radio-quiet quasar of this luminosity – one can set a lower limit on the X-ray absorbing column . Such a large column has a Thomson optical depth to electron scattering , sufficient to extinguish the optical and UV emission. The contradiction becomes even more acute if the gas is neutral since the opacity in the Lyman continuum becomes extremely large, , conflicting with the source detection below 912 Å. This apparent contradiction probably means that our lines-of-sight to the X-ray and to the UV emitting regions are different, such that the gas completely covers the compact X-ray source but only partially the more extended source of ultraviolet photons. An extended () X-ray source is detected to the south-east of the QSO. Given its thermal spectrum and temperature (), it is probably a foreground () cluster of galaxies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clavel et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: