Key result
AcQMap with robotic magnetic navigation linked to ~11% higher acute AT termination versus sequential 3D mapping.
Why the study?
The authors aimed to assess the performance of integrating a novel high-resolution noncontact mapping system (AcQMap) with robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) during catheter ablation for atrial tachycardias.
Does catheter ablation using the integrated AcQMap-RMN system improve acute success and reduce recurrences compared to sequential 3D mapping in patients with atrial tachycardias?
Cohort (n=125)
No
Does catheter ablation using the integrated AcQMap-RMN system improve acute success and reduce recurrences compared to sequential 3D mapping in patients with atrial tachycardias?
Absolute Event Rate: 88.4% vs 79.3%
p-value: p=0.04
Integration of dipole charge density mapping (AcQMap) with robotic magnetic navigation for atrial tachycardia ablation is safe and significantly improves acute success while reducing 12-month recurrence compared to sequential 3D mapping.
May support AcQMap-RMN integration for atrial tachycardia ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation (CA) has become a well-established first-line therapy for a broad spectrum of arrhythmias, including atrial tachycardias (ATs). In this study we aimed to assess the performance of the integrated novel high-resolution new generation noncontact mapping system (AcQMap) with robotic magnetic navigation (RMN) system in CA procedures for patients with ATs including comparing patient subgroups based on the utilized mapping modality, arrhythmia mechanism, localization and type of procedure. METHODS: All patients undergoing CA for AT using the AcQMap-RMN system were included. Procedural safety and efficacy were characterized by intra- and post-procedural complications. Acute procedural success and the long-term outcome were assessed in the overall group and in the subgroups. RESULTS: A total number of 70 patients were referred for CA with atrial arrhythmias including 67 AT/AFL (mean age 57.1 ± 14.4 years), and 3 additional patients with inappropriate sinus tachycardia. Thirty-eight patients had de novo AT, 24 had post-PVI AT including 2 patients with perinodal AT, and 5 had post-MAZE AT. Two patients (2.9%) suffered post-procedural complications including 1 patient with groin hematoma and 1 patient with a transient ischemic attack. Acute success was achieved in 63/67 (94.0%) procedures. Thirteen patients (19.4%) had documented recurrence at the end of the 12-months follow-up period. The performance of AcQMap was equally good in focal vs. reentry mechanisms (p = 0.61, acute success), in the left and right atrium (p = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: AcQMap-RMN integration might improve success rates in CA of ATs with low number of complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gagyi et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Atrial tachycardias (n=125). Dipole charge density mapping (AcQMap) integrated with robotic magnetic navigation vs. Sequential 3D mapping (CARTO) integrated with robotic magnetic navigation was evaluated on Acute AT termination after RF application (p=0.04). AcQMap integrated with robotic magnetic navigation significantly improved acute atrial tachycardia termination compared to sequential 3D mapping (88.4% vs 79.3%, p=0.04) with a low complication rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: