Key result
Transthoracic echocardiography measurement of inferior vena cava diameter variations (>16%) predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-0.98), based on only one valid study.
Why the study?
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately predict fluid responsiveness compared to thermodilution in intensive care patients with circulatory failure?
Systematic Review
Does transthoracic echocardiography accurately predict fluid responsiveness compared to thermodilution in intensive care patients with circulatory failure?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-0.98)
There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend TTE for predicting fluid responsiveness when using thermodilution as the gold standard, as only one study met rigorous inclusion criteria.
Insufficient evidence precludes recommending TTE IVC variation for fluid responsiveness; leaves open its utility versus thermodilution.
An essential part of intensive care is to accurately identify fluid responders among patients with circulatory failure. Over the past few years, new techniques have been assessed for rapid and non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness. As transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is becoming an integrated tool in the intensive care unit, this systematic review examined studies evaluating the predictive value of TTE for fluid responsiveness. In October 2012, we searched Pubmed, EMBASE and Web of Science for studies evaluating the predictive value of TTE-derived variables for fluid responsiveness defined as change in thermodilution cardiac output or stroke volume after a fluid challenge or a passive leg raising test. The use of thermodilution was used as inclusion criterion because it is the only method validated to show the change in cardiac output or stroke volume, which defines fluid responsiveness. Of the 4294 evaluated citations, only one study fully met our inclusion criteria. In this study, the predictive value of variations in inferior vena cava diameter (> 16%) for fluid responsiveness was moderate with sensitivity of 71% [95% confidence interval (CI) 44-90], specificity of 100% (95% CI 73-100) and an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-0.98). Only one study of TTE-based methods fulfilled the criteria for valid assessment of fluid responsiveness. Before recommending the use of TTE in predicting fluid responsiveness, proper evaluation including thermodilution technique as the gold standard is needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wetterslev et al. (2012) conducted a systematic review in Circulatory failure. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) vs. Thermodilution was evaluated on Predictive value of variations in inferior vena cava diameter (> 16%) for fluid responsiveness (AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Transthoracic echocardiography measurement of inferior vena cava diameter variations (>16%) predicted fluid responsiveness with an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.73-0.98), based on only one valid study.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: