Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Place has been an important sociological concept in urban and rural sociology. Sociological scholarship has recognized the place as a physical setting, a location for social action, and full of social meanings. Sociology has historically focused most of its attention on place’s social dimensions, including its cultural meanings and purposes (Bell, 1994; Gieryn, 2000; Lofland, 1998). Environmental sociology, specifically the co-constructionist posture (Rice, 2013), calls us to consider how place’s physical and social dimensions are conjointly constituted (Freudenburg et al., 1995). In this paper, I draw upon the co-constructionist posture to bridge the gap between environmental sociology and other sociological understandings of place and place-based identity. I use the co-constructionist approach as an ontological orientation for analyzing social and material interconnections at work in the Mississippi River town of Sabula, Iowa. I analyze Sabula residents’ descriptions, experiences, and practices through which they understand the river town they live in and their connection to it. This case study highlights how the co-constructionist posture can build on the existing place literature to offer a more blended approach to the dimensions of place and identity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas Baxter (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: