Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To examine the effects of an after-school NutriActive program on anthropometric measurements, motor skills, and fitness levels of young children. DESIGN: In this quasi-experimental study, anthropometric, motor skill, and fitness measurements were compared between intervention and control students at baseline, following a 4-week intervention, and after a summer break (4 months). SETTING: Two intervention and two control microurban elementary schools. SUBJECTS: Forty-two intervention and 28 control kindergarten and first-grade students (50% boys, 82% Caucasian). INTERVENTION: A 4-week program consisted daily ofa morning walk and an after-school physical activity lesson with an emphasis on motor skill development, nutrition/health lesson, snack, and nonstructured active play. MEASURES: Body mass index, waist circumference, and fitness and motor skill levels. ANALYSIS: Repeated-measures analysis of variance, t-test, and stepwise regression. RESULTS: The intervention group scored significantly better on some fitness and all motor skill tests at 4 weeks. The improvements in fitness and skill levels ranged from 30% to 270%. At 4 months, differences between the groups diminished but remained significant, with better scores for the intervention group on some tests. Skill levels emerged as predictors of cardiovascular fitness at 4 months. Anthropometric measurements did not differ between the groups at any time point. CONCLUSION: A short, intense after-school program can produce significant, sustainable improvements in motor skill and fitness levels of young children.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matvienko et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: