Key result
Controlled intermittent breathing significantly altered time domain variations in heart rate compared to spontaneous breathing (p < 0.01), indicating a shift from parasympathetic to sympathetic activity.
Why the study?
Does intermittent controlled breathing alter heart rate variability and cardiovascular performance compared to spontaneous breathing in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=7)
No
Does intermittent controlled breathing alter heart rate variability and cardiovascular performance compared to spontaneous breathing in healthy subjects?
Short-term controlled breathing in normal subjects primarily affects autonomic control, shifting activity from parasympathetic to sympathetic, without significantly altering myocardial energy consumption or vascular function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open effects of controlled breathing on autonomic balance in patients.
The autonomic nervous system plays an important role in modulating cardiovascular function. Previous studies have shown that impairment of the autonomic regulation is a marker of cardiovascular diseases, but none has simultaneously quantified underlying cardiac and vascular changes. We hypothesized that by tracking multiple variables underlying autonomic control, performance of the heart and the vascular system, a more comprehensive view of cardiovascular regulation can be obtained. The protocol involved five minutes of spontaneous breathing, followed by five minutes of intermittent breathing on experimental subjects free from existing cardiac and respiratory ailments (n=7, males 25-38 years-old). Time and frequency domain heart rate variability (HRV) analyses were performed to probe overall cardiovascular regulation during the two breathing patterns. Rate pressure product (RPP) to assess cardiac performance and estimates of arterial compliance (C) to assess vascular function were also obtained. Time domain results showed dissimilar variations in heart rate between the two breathing patterns (p < 0.01). A shift in power from high frequency components to low frequency components was observed in the power spectrum which indicates a shift from parasympathetic to sympathetic activity. Differences in RPP for the two breathing patterns were not significantly significant, indicating overall myocardial oxygen consumption was unaffected by the controlled breathing protocol. However, components contributing to RPP, i.e. mean HR and systolic blood pressure, both slightly increased during intermittent breathing. Variations in beat to beat arterial compliance showed that compliance increased during breath holding and decreased during release, but mean beat to beat arterial compliance values of the two breathing patterns was not statistically different. Thus, we were able to track multiple variables underlying autonomic control, cardiac performance and vascular function. We conclude that that short-term perturbation in controlled breathing can provide an effective means to probe overall cardiovascular regulation. In normal subjects, such perturbations affect primarily autonomic control and less so in affecting energy consumption of the heart or vascular function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christopher Yung (2011) conducted an observational in Healthy subjects (n=7). Controlled intermittent breathing vs. Spontaneous breathing was evaluated on Time domain variations in heart rate (p=<0.01). Controlled intermittent breathing significantly altered time domain variations in heart rate compared to spontaneous breathing (p < 0.01), indicating a shift from parasympathetic to sympathetic activity.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: