Key result
Despite being more insulin-resistant, postprandial endothelial function following a standardized breakfast did not differ in African-American women compared to white women.
Why the study?
Does postprandial endothelial function differ between African-American and white women following a standardized meal?
Cross-Sectional (n=36)
Single-blind
No
Does postprandial endothelial function differ between African-American and white women following a standardized meal?
Despite being more insulin-resistant, African-American women have comparable postprandial endothelial function to white women, suggesting insulin sensitivity may not be the primary determinant of racial differences in endothelial function.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparable postprandial endothelial function despite insulin resistance differences should not yet alter practice; leaves open alternative drivers of racial vascular disparities.
Insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction. Because African-American women are more insulin-resistant than white women, it is assumed that African-American women have impaired endothelial function. However, racial differences in postprandial endothelial function have not been examined. In this study, we test the hypothesis that African-American women have impaired postprandial endothelial function compared with white women. Postprandial endothelial function following a breakfast (20% protein, 40% fat, and 40% carbohydrate) was evaluated in 36 (18 African-American women, 18 white women) age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched (age: 37 ± 11 yr; BMI: 30 ± 6 kg/m(2)) women. Endothelial function, defined by percent change in brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), was measured at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h following a meal. There were no significant differences between the groups in baseline FMD, total body fat, abdominal visceral fat, and fasting levels of glucose, insulin, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or serum estradiol. Although African-American women were less insulin-sensitive [insulin sensitivity index (mean ± SD): 3.6 ± 1.5 vs. 5.2 ± 2.6, P = 0.02], both fasting triglyceride (TG: 56 ± 37 vs. 97 ± 49 mg/dl, P = 0.007) and incremental TG area under the curve (AUC(0-6hr): 279 ± 190 vs. 492 ± 255 mg·dl(-1)·min(-1)·10(-2), P = 0.008) were lower in African-American than white women. Breakfast was associated with a significant increase in FMD in whites and African-Americans, and there was no significant difference in postprandial FMD between the groups (P > 0.1 for group × time interactions). Despite being insulin-resistant, postprandial endothelial function in African-American women was comparable to white women. These results imply that insulin sensitivity may not be an important determinant of racial differences in endothelial function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muniyappa et al. (2011) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy women (n=36). African-American race vs. White race was evaluated on Difference in postprandial flow-mediated dilation (FMD) following a standardized breakfast (p=>0.1). Despite being more insulin-resistant, postprandial endothelial function following a standardized breakfast did not differ in African-American women compared to white women.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: