Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates ultrasound effects on starch structure, highlighting implications for food technology.
To elucidate how ultrasound affects starch architecture, starches with varying amylopectin/amylose ratios and pre-gelatinised states were systematically investigated. Waxy maize starch (WMS, 1% amylose), normal maize starch (NMS, 26% amylose), and Gelose 80 (G80, 80% amylose) were pre-conditioned to non- (A: 50 °C), semi- (B: 65 °C/85 °C), and fully gelatinised (C: 95 °C/140 °C) states prior to sonication (20 kHz, 1 h, 2250 J/cm 3 ). Multi-scale structural characterization, spanning granular to molecular levels, was performed using mastersizer, polarised light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), X-ray diffraction (XRD), small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS), Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Ultrasound promoted granule disruption and amylopectin dispersion, accompanied by significant reductions in gelatinization enthalpy ( ΔH ), relative crystallinity (RC), SAXS peak intensity (q ≈ 0.07 Å −1 ), and double-helix content. In contrast, crystalline polymorphism, single-helix content, and molecular size distribution remained largely unchanged. These findings reveal selective ultrasound-induced modulation primarily targeting amylopectin double helices, with structural susceptibility dictated by amylopectin architecture and granule integrity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: