PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 27, 2026British Journal of Social Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Conceptions of national identity and interreligious contact avoidance in differing domains: A multigroup analysis of majority and minority religious groups in India

View Full Paper
KYKumar YogeeswaranJGJessica GaleMVMaykel Verkuyten

Key Points

  • This research investigates the relationship between inclusive and exclusive national identity conceptions and interreligious contact avoidance among different religious groups in India.
  • Analyzed data from a national sample of approximately 30,000 individuals including Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs, and Buddhists.
  • Conducted multigroup path analysis to explore the associations between national identity and interreligious contact avoidance in public and private contexts.
  • Measured contact avoidance in both neighborly interactions and marriage situations.
  • Inclusive national identity significantly reduced interreligious contact avoidance among most groups in neighborly contexts, except for Buddhists.
  • Exclusive Hindu national identity correlated with higher interreligious avoidance among both majority and minority groups, particularly in marriage.
  • No significant association was found for Sikhs in marriage contact avoidance and Muslims in general interreligious avoidance.

Abstract

The current research examined how inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity were associated with interreligious contact avoidance across relatively public (neighbours) versus private (marriage) domains among majority and minority religious groups. Using data from a large national sample (N ~ 30,000) of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Sikhs and Buddhists in the rarely studied context of India, we found that an inclusive and tolerant conception of Indian national identity was strongly endorsed among all groups, while an exclusive Hindu national identity was more strongly endorsed by the Hindu majority than religious minorities. Interreligious contact avoidance was consistently higher among all groups in the context of marriage than neighbours. Multigroup path analysis revealed that an inclusive national identity was associated with less interreligious avoidance as neighbours among majority and minority groups (except Buddhists), but it was unrelated to interreligious avoidance in the domain of marriage among all (except Sikhs). By contrast, an exclusive national identity was associated with more contact avoidance both as neighbours and through marriage among majority and minority religious groups (except Muslims). Collectively, these findings reveal that inclusive versus exclusive conceptions of national identity can be differentially associated with distinct forms of contact avoidance among majority and minority groups.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yogeeswaran et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a16898b0c924ddd1bd582eahttps://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.70100
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper