Key result
Multimodal psychophysiological assessment strongly discriminates IBS subtypes with an AUC up to ~0.98.
Why the study?
Comprehensive models integrating multidimensional psychophysiological biomarkers to predict irritable bowel syndrome subtypes often lack validation in this heterogeneous population.
Does a psychophysiological multimodal approach identify predictive signatures for IBS-C and IBS-D?
Case-Control (n=240)
No
Does a psychophysiological multimodal approach identify predictive signatures for IBS-C and IBS-D?
Psychosocial factors and sleep disturbances are shared predictive risk factors for IBS-C and IBS-D, with subtype-specific signatures including prominent emotional reactivity in IBS-C and altered sensory-autonomic integration in IBS-D.
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) with a complex, multifactorial pathogenesis. Emerging evidence underscores the significant role of psychosocial factors; however, comprehensive models integrating multidimensional psychophysiological biomarkers to predict IBS subtypes often lack validation in this highly heterogeneous population. To evaluate the value of a psychophysiological multimodal approach in identifying predictive signatures for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) and diarrhea (IBS-D). In this cross-sectional study, 80 IBS-C patients, 80 IBS-D patients, and 80 healthy controls were included. Assessments included eye-tracking (cognitive-emotional interaction), heart rate variability (autonomic function), psychological scales (SCL-90, SCSQ, EPQ), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Multivariable logistic regression and ROC analyses were utilized to identify predictors and evaluate internal model performance. Shared predictive factors for both subtypes included the SCL-90 hostility factor, EPQ neuroticism, negative coping, and global PSQI score (all P < 0.05). IBS-C was specifically associated with hostility and neuroticism, whereas IBS-D was distinctively predicted by prolonged prosaccade latency, reduced HRV medium-frequency power, and a lack of positive coping. The models demonstrated strong internal discrimination, with AUCs up to 0.983 for IBS-C and 0.967 for IBS-D. Psychosocial factors and sleep disturbances are robust shared predictive risk factors for IBS-C and IBS-D. Furthermore, multimodal profiling reveals subtype-specific predictive signatures: prominent emotional reactivity in IBS-C, and altered sensory-autonomic integration in IBS-D. These findings underscore the associative heterogeneity of IBS and highlight the potential utility of psychophysiologically targeted interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) conducted a case-control in Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS-C and IBS-D) (n=240). Psychophysiological multimodal assessment vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Model discrimination for IBS-C and IBS-D. A psychophysiological multimodal approach demonstrated strong internal discrimination for irritable bowel syndrome subtypes, achieving AUCs up to 0.983 for IBS-C and 0.967 for IBS-D.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: