Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates regional green innovation in China, highlighting policy implications for developing nations.
Green innovation is an advanced driver and key catalyst for regional high-quality development, while environmental regulation provides an important policy guarantee and institutional framework for fostering regional green innovation. Moving beyond the traditional paradigm that examines a single policy instrument in isolation, this study re-examines the effectiveness of command-and-control environmental regulation within the unique institutional context of government-led regional collaborative governance in China. Using panel data for 81 cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) region and surrounding provinces from 2008 to 2021, we employ a quasi-natural experimental design to evaluate the effect of the Coordinated Development Strategy of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (CDSBTH) on regional green innovation. The findings show that CDSBTH effectively promotes regional green innovation by strengthening command-and-control environmental regulation. The policy effect varies significantly across different types of cities in the BTH region. Under a systematic and mandatory regional top-level design, traditional command-and-control environmental regulation can be transformed into an effective drivers of green innovation. This study verifies and enriches the applicability of the Porter hypothesis under specific governance structures and provides both a theoretical case from the Chinese context and policy implications for other developing countries seeking achieve green technology catch-up through policy intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: