Evaluates climatic suitability of rice cropping systems in China, suggesting specific adaptations for climate change.
Climate warming is reshaping hydrothermal resources for rice production, but the climatic responses of different rice-based cropping systems have not been sufficiently compared. This study evaluated the climatic suitability and dominant climatic controls of four major rice cropping systems in China: single-season rice, double-season rice, rice–wheat rotation, and rice–maize rotation. Occurrence records were extracted from ChinaCP and screened using a 30 m rice distribution mask. MaxEnt models were calibrated using agroclimatic variables for the historical baseline and end-century SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 scenarios. The models showed good presence–background discrimination, with mean training AUC values of 0.868 ± 0.001, 0.959 ± 0.001, 0.969 ± 0.002, and 0.963 ± 0.003 for the four systems, respectively. Dominant climatic controls differed among systems. Single-season rice, rice–wheat rotation, and rice–maize rotation were mainly associated with heat accumulation, with temperature ≥0 °C (AT0) showing the highest permutation importance of 55.9%, 59.8%, and 77.0%, respectively. Double-season rice showed a distinct response constrained by precipitation and monthly temperature conditions, with annual precipitation contributing 69.8%. Scenario-based projections for 2081–2100 indicated a system-specific redistribution of climatic suitability, with northward increases most evident for single-season rice and rice–wheat rotation, localized changes for double-season rice, and increased suitability for rice–maize rotation mainly in Southwest and parts of South China. Changes were stronger under SSP5-8.5. These findings show that rice-based cropping systems should not be treated as a single uniform category in climate-change suitability assessments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: