Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reveals MCUb’s role in tuning mitochondrial calcium uniporter activity, indicating its regulatory capacity.
The mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter mediates mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake to regulate cellular bioenergetics, Ca2+ signaling and survival, but excessive activity triggers Ca2+ overload and tissue injury. Cells counter this threat by expressing MCUb, a paralog of the uniporter’s pore-forming MCU subunit, to attenuate uniporter activity. Despite harboring the conserved Ca2+-coordinating DIME motif, MCUb paradoxically lacks conductance, a defining yet enigmatic feature underlying its uniporter-inhibitory role. Here, we demonstrate that MCUb’s non-conductivity stems from its inability to bind EMRE, a subunit essential for uniporter function, and that its N-terminal domain (NTD) exerts autoinhibition. Reinstating EMRE binding and relieving NTD-mediated inhibition rebuild Ca2+ conductance in MCUb, reaching ~80% of MCU activity. Wild-type MCUb exhibits ~30% of the inhibitory capacity of a pore-disrupting E249A variant, indicating that MCUb is a modest, rather than potent, negative regulator. These findings reveal how MCU-MCUb paralog divergence endows the uniporter with regulatory plasticity to fine-tune mitochondrial Ca2+ homeostasis. Cells prevent the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter from causing Ca2+ overload and cell death by expressing the non-conductive regulator MCUb. Here, the authors rebuild Ca2+ conductance in MCUb, revealing the molecular basis of its regulatory function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: