Randomized trial demonstrates improved rescue efficiency and resource allocation during wildfires, highlighting critical strategies for emergency management.
This study presents a novel integrated methodology for optimizing forest fire emergency rescue vehicle scheduling through the synergistic combination of a multi-criteria demand urgency grading framework and mechanistic fire spread propagation modeling, enhancing spatiotemporal resource allocation efficiency under evolving wildfire scenarios. The research focuses on three core aspects: First, a multi-dimensional demand urgency evaluation system is established, incorporating fire threat, response efficiency, and path factors. Subjective and objective weights are determined through fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and entropy method, respectively, while grey relational analysis TOPSIS method is employed for prioritizing affected areas. The model’s validity is verified using wildfire data from the Greater Khingan Mountains. Second, a multi-objective vehicle scheduling model is developed, combining total rescue time, cost, and urgency ranking index via weighted sum method. A fire spread model is innovatively introduced to dynamically adjust urgency classification, with genetic algorithm (GA) and Genetic Simulated Annealing Algorithm (GASA) designed for solution optimization. Finally, empirical analysis of 13 fire cases in the Greater Khingan Mountains (2020) demonstrates that GASA outperforms GA, achieving 17% reduction in rescue time, 1% cost savings, 22% shorter travel distance, and 0.7% improvement in urgency ranking. Incorporating the fire spread model enhances the urgency ranking index by 10.78%, where the improvement is defined as the percentage increase in the achieved objective function value f3 compared to the solution obtained without dynamic fire propagation information. By integrating dynamic urgency assessment with intelligent algorithms, this research constructs a spatiotemporal-aware emergency scheduling framework aligned with forest fire evolution patterns, providing theoretical foundations and practical strategies to enhance rescue efficiency and resource allocation, with significant implications for disaster management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: