Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Analyzes metrics for software quality assurance, suggesting a framework for evaluation to enhance user satisfaction.
The quality of software indicates how much the software performs its functions intended to bring maximum satisfaction to the user. The issue of software quality assurance remains a checkpoint for producing competent software products with fewer defects, capable of fulfilling the objective of satisfying the user. This study is geared towards this direction by analyzing the dependency of the software quality life cycle on software quality assurance. It also analyzed the basic concepts of software quality assurance, with which it deduced that software quality activities have to be a continuous process throughout software development in order to assure quality of software. This study further proposed a logic for choosing metrics during the evaluation stages. It concluded by positing that the choice of metrics should largely depend on the desired software properties and attributes, with the assurance that quality guidelines are not compromised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nwandu et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: